In 2002 The So called Affected Family Member issued an Intervention Order claiming that her Cat feeding Containers as Pictured Left were Disappearing.
The Defendant in This case was the Former Son-In-Law of Her Best Friend.
The Woman Told The Magistrate that where she fed the stray and Feral Cats was her place of work, She said The Council Paid her to Feed the cats that lived behind shops at a strip Shopping Centre. The Woman asked The Magistrate that she be awarded costs from the Defendant to cover the costs of the missing Containers.
The Defendant had over a period of 11 years used the road at Left to attend a Gym and Leisureworks at The End Of The Street that the Woman Lived In.
At One Point The Defendant Parked his Car in Conway Court and walked up the Street To The Gym past the Woman's House.
In The Woman's Statement of Complaint she Claimed that The Defendant was Parking not far from Her House And was Stalking Her. Which was absolutely Complete Nonsense.
The Woman told the Magistrate that there had never been any incidents at Her Home, Her Only Concern was the Disappearance of her Cat feeding Containers which she fed on a Nightly Basis.
In 2002 The Woman agreed to an Intervention Order of 3 Metres to last for a period of 12 Months as agreed to with The Defendants Barrister.
You Have to ask yourself how ridiculous the Intervention Order Needs to Be Before the application is Rejected by The Magistrate. What makes it worse is the Registrar allowed the Woman to issue a Variation For 25 Metres just a few weeks later. When The Defendant went to Court The applicant didn't appear at Court and the Variation was Struck Out.
The Catwoman had also Given a false Statement to the Court, Because The Defendant Contacted the Local Council and asked them Whether They paid The Woman To Feed The Cats, they said they had never paid anybody to feed the cats, Nor would they in The Future.
Over The Next 12 Months there were no complaints made to Police for any Breeches of the Order By The Catwoman and She did Not apply to the Magistrate's Court for an Extension of The order , But 2 Months later when The Defendant applied to Vary his Ex-Mother-in-laws Intervention Order, The Catwoman went to The Court and applied for another Intervention Order.
The Defendant considered the Catwoman's New Order, Pure Retaliation for applying to Vary His Ex Mother-in-law's Intervention Order, who was her Best Friend. The Catwoman was trying to be a Pest With Her False allegations by creating a Legal Roadblock to the Defendant's access to the Gym and Leisure Centre at the End Of Her Street.
In 2003 the matter came before Magistrate Denise O'Reilly over the Disappearance of The Cat Feeding Containers at Left.
Despite the Fact The Original Magistrate said that he Couldn't issue an Intervention Order to Cover the Cat Feeding Containers that were in a Public place.
Magistrate Denise O'Reilly Issued an Order that Covered The Whole Shopping Centre For a Period of 5 Years!!!!. The Defendant and His Barrister Could't Believe it???. She also Ordered that any Future Variation's of the Orders had to Be Heard By Her.
What Magistrate Denise O'Reilly Decision did was make it a Criminal offense for The Defendant to shop at Any of the Stores Pictured Below for a Period of 5 Years!!!. Despite there being no allegations of Violence, Threats Or Property Damage Whatsoever. Simply Unbelievable when you Consider that some of these shops are at least 100 Metres from The Catwoman's Cat feeding Containers!!!!.
You would Wonder what The Magistrate's Decision would be if people placed Cat Feeding Containers out the front of a Magistrate's Court as Pictured Left???. According to The Local Council there is no By Law that makes it a criminal offence to feed Stray and Feral Cats in Public Places???. Would the Magistrate issue an Intervention order against anybody who removed the Containers from this site outside the Court??. I Don't think any Magistrate would do this, let alone issue one for a period of 5 Years. A leading Magistrate has said he doesn't issue Intervention orders for any longer than 3 Years!!!.
This Took The Order out from 2003 Until 2008, Over This Period the Defendant had no Contact at all with the Catwoman, but in 2008 the Catwoman applied to the Court to have the order extended for another 12 Months stating that she had been receiving hang up Phone calls.
In Court The Catwoman produced no Evidence to support her Allegations, when asked if she had the Phone calls traced she Replied, well I Don't know whether it was the Defendant or The Indians, Who are telemarketers. She was then asked why she hadn't reported the Phone calls as a Breech of an Intervention Order to Police, Once again she gave The Same Reply.
When The Catwoman was asked to supply a list of The Times and Dates of The Calls, she went to her bag and then said she had left the List at Home.
The Magistrate then asked the Defendant to consent to an Undertaking, to which the Defendant replied that there was no evidence to support the Signing of an Undertaking. The magistrate then granted the Extension of the Order For another Year, which stated the Defendant Could Not Stalk the Catwoman.
The Defendant had not driven down The Catwoman's Street Since 2003!!, This was Five Years later and the Extension was still granted, Totally Ridiculous and Unneccessary, But That's Exactly what happens in many cases that are heard before Victorian Courts. There was no Criminal Intent in this case The Defendant Merely wanted to use The Gym Facilities at The End Of The Street and there was no way to do that except drive Down The Street.
What is very strange about this Intervention order is On The Other side of The Street The woman also fed Stray and Feral Cats Under a Community Hall as well, The Catwoman must have fed them well on a daily basis, because the owners of the Hall ( Pictured Left ) Went to the expense of Installing Thick Chicken wire around the Base Of The Hall to stop the cats getting to the food that the catwoman Fed Them, She also left Milk and water Under The Hall for the Cats Too!!.
Also The Catwoman never attended the facilities at the end of her street that the Defendant had been going to either.What makes it even more Ridiculous is the fact the Court deemed The Woman to be a protected Witness??? Over Cat Feeding Containers????. Totally Ridiculous.
No comments:
Post a Comment